There are instances where someone would wish to see more results, relevant or not. In which case I suggest you add a 'Load more search results' button so that it gives more results. Do add a header saying that 'Results are not necessarily relevant or trustworthy after this section'.
29
Add multiple pages of results
a month later
Hi, I've used Kagi for a couple of months as my default search engine and am generally satisfied. But sometimes I turn back to Google when Kagi gives me a page of results with no obvious way of getting more. Take for example a recent query: https://kagi.com/search?q=tomcat+loom+java
There are sixteen results, all appropriate, but Google shows many more, many bad. Still, I often find what I need in an obscure result a few pages down. So, I'd like an option to explore the less-good matches. It seems that it would also give you good feedback to know when you need to try harder.
Kagi's logic is that you'd change your query if you didn't find it in the initial results (e.g. work with "" or other operators, ...). Exploring the less-good matches is no bad idea either though, but I wouldn't call it "trying harder"
Merged 2 posts from "Try harder" button to show lower quality matches.
This is planned and will be added.
12 days later
No matter what I search, there is only one page search result. How can I go to the next page？
Merged 1 post from Where is the buttom of the next page of the search result?.
12 days later
Vlad I'd like to add that I also support this very much as I too switch back to Bing/Google to finish the same search for more results hidden a few pages back, however I also don't want to see Kagi stray away from taking the beautiful concept of quality over quantity to the next level by actually limiting search results instead of it just being a marketing phrase. It's this concept of limiting search results that made me absolutely fall in love with Kagi when I first saw it unlike Google's focus on providing millions.
As Kagi's search quality improves over time, I would actually love to see the day where Kagi only shows you 5 insanely best of the best search results and nothing more. It'd be cool/interesting to see Kagi slowly reducing total search results shown year after year as Kagi's quality improves. Sort of like milestones for advancing search quality instead of limiting them from the start.
9 days later
a month later
Steps to reproduce:
Search for something like reddit.com technoproduction
Expected behavior:
Get more than one page of results
Debug info:
Windows, Firefox
Image/Video:
Something like this should return a lot more results or at least prompt the user to request more. There are hundreds if not thousands of posts. When I try to be more specific it's even worse.
Merged 2 posts from Small result set.
Steps to reproduce:
Run this search:
https://kagi.com/search?q=uk+5ghz+wifi
Only approximately 20 results are returned. Only a few of those are specific to the UK, and an appreciable number are related to shopping, not a discussion of 5GHz WiFi channels in the UK.
Expected behavior:
The same Google search returns 3.5 million results! The first page of results, at least, are specific to the UK and none are shopping-related.
Granted, probably many of those Google results are spam, but I would expect there would at least be a few thousand informative articles and sites that cover this topic.
Debug info:
I've tried this on Safari and Chrome with the same results. I thought it must be a content blocker hiding the "next page" button, but that does not appear to be the case as I've reloaded the page with content blockers disabled.
Image/Video:
dhess Our goal is to help users find what they are looking for not show millions of irrelevant or spam results. With search, quality>quantity.
https://kagi.com/faq#relevance
Did you find the result you were looking for this query?
3 months later
Merged 2 posts from Only 17 results returned for a search that should generate orders of magnitude more hits.
- Edited
I think that philosophy is making you blind to the use case where a user wants to browse dozens if not hundeds of links as a way of discovering more content. If you give a limited window into a search query you are assuming the user only wants that many results. However when researching things, it is quite common that the amount of things that are of interest exceed a dozen or two dozen pages. If you strictly limit the result set without being able to lengthen it with an additional request I will have to say that this is a deal breaker for me. I very often require more than a page of results in my research.
Also, the amount of "personal" sites that discuss these items are rarely even indexed as much as they used to be in the younger days of search; and I am certain they have valuable content and are in the hundreds if not thousands. When I am not just researching or trying to learn, those additional vectors are very important. We don't want to encourage echo chambers do we?
Please maintain your bar of excellence but also grant the user who wishes to view more, to view more. If need be even say that the results after the initial set are of less certain quality. It's frustrating from a user experience to be in a position of helplessness when you know where is more and no action can be taken.
I support the vision and high quality you are striving for - I'd just like to be able to handle the use case of discovery and exploration as well. There is a key consideration of echo chambers and recommendation engines forcing a local maxima.
aaaaddddd Your point is well taken. One thing we need to consider at Kagi is cost of search.
While in an ad-supported search engine more pages = more money (more likely to click on ad) with Kagi more pages = more cost.
If we added the option for more results and people searched 10 pages vs 1 per query our cost could explode. This is why we need to balance until we have pay per search model or a higher base price.
I know it is not the answer you wanted but it is something we need to think about.
a month later
@Vlad I can imagine a scenario where paginated results actually reduce costs: instead of displaying 20–50 results by default on one page, display 10 results per page; most users may be satisfied with results on the first page. Wouldn't 10 results cost less than 20–50?
Yes, some users would continue through 5+ pages, but presumably the cost for additional pages would not be more than requiring the user to submit a new, rewritten query that then loads another 20–50 results.