@Giorgio Thanks for implementing my suggestion! Just noticed it!
Incidentally, have you made any changes to the definitions? It might just be my impression, but it seems to me that their quality in non-English languages has improved. Perhaps this is because the definitions are being translated from the source language? (Just a guess.)
Aside from that, I have one more suggestion that I believe would be useful, though not essential:
Within the definitions themselves, indicate the part of speech to which each specific meaning belongs, since the same word can sometimes function as both a noun and an adverb, for example.
