Hi @jpg , our
"" operator is already implemented as a strict content match, with only a few exceptions where we found it to be too strict by some user's reports.
You can also use the "verbatim" mode, which does the same thing without you having to type the quotes around every term.
If you find a case where this doesn't work as expected, that could be a bug we could look into.
I will make a note about programming searches: we have some improvements we are working on specifically for this case.