kirkmc No, that was never the suggestion, re-read the OP. The suggestion was for it to be an optional alternative.
Kagi is about providing information tailored to what users want. Grokipedia provides an alternative that some people will prefer. The more options the better. It isn't Kagi's job to tell people what the truth it. If people want that, they can use Google instead.
And to respond to some other comments. I could see Kagi in the long term maybe offering optional paid widgets. For example pay $X per month for the Britannica widget, and they could go into an agreement with Britannica to provide that. I'd absolutely pay maybe a few dollars extra a month to have Britannica show up for any topic it covers, and for its articles to be included as sources in LLM web search queries. Add as another widget, a bunch of legit dictionaries, the full 20 volume Oxford, plus simpler dictionaries as well. Again, would 100% pay for that.
And personally, I'd choose to include both Wikipedia and Grokipedia results. So I can get both biased opinions, and form my own.
