Align Quick Answer with Wolfram Answer

CrunchyFritos

I really like the integration of Wolfram in the most recent update, but Quick Answer doesn’t seem to be aligned:

I expect the quick answer and the widget provided answer to be the same. Although in this specific case, quick answer is probably also just redundant.

Vlad

CrunchyFritos These do two different things. One gets computational answer (WA) and the other summarizes the search results (Quick Answer). They are expected to be different for such queries.

Igak

Also in my opinion, you should start actually testing things, especially if you put them as headlines of your ChangeLog

Vlad

Igak This is a different issue, see https://kagifeedback.org/d/3180-time-converter-is-buggy/

CrunchyFritos

Vlad Hmm, it seems like if Kagi knows to poll for a computational answer then either (1) Quick Answer should not automatically run at all since the computational answer would effectively be the "quick answer" or (2) Quick Answer should know to factor in the computational answer that in as if it were a (prioritized) search result?

Vlad

CrunchyFritos I agree there could be more logic added, but in essence quick answer tries to summarize your search results.

For example consider this:

While accurate, I was not satisfied with it. So i want to summarize my search results.

This is where I appreciate the ability to do both.

CrunchyFritos

Vlad Fair point. I appreciate the thoughtful response.