I suggest an option very similar to 'Report as AI-generated', particularly for phishing sites.
I argue that AI slop and phishing pages are not even contents due to inherent uselessness (if not harm) in results.
Currently there is 'Report as AI-generated'. I think this is useful for anyone who in uninterested in AI-generated content is web results.
Also pervasive, even leaching Google Search results, is phishing websites for downloading common software or books, as exemplified here (#10320).
For users who find reporting AI content empowering and communally useful (once reviewed to be valid), reporting phishing sites too is highly needed.
There have been occasions where I would tell my mother (over the phone) to download a piece of software. I normally skip the phishing sites and 'redirection loop' sites without noticing. Then when my mom searches and clicks the first result results and things turn out strange (on the phone), I realize the problem.
If Kagi could work to fight AI slop, it should also work to fight phishing hazards.
This is not really a content issue we can disagree over. This is pure fluff. A person looking for a book or a piece of software wants the actual working thing. Never will one want malware or an 'enter your mobile no and complete this form' or 'your computer is infected, get the antivirus' sort of stuff.
Basically, I am arguing that AI slop and phishing sites are not even contents people will disagree over. They should be filtered out without issue. Perhaps for transparency, Kagi could offer to show filtered out results if a user wants to see the 'full list of results' (eg: for research, or very peculiar/advanced/thorough searching).
Note that this is not the same as misleading reviews, alternative products, etc. This is obviously subjective.
This applies specifically to fake websites, clickbait pages/PDFs/videos that lead you to something different than what you want.
