With the prompt
I get the following answer
According to the retrieved content, there are no external links or citations listed within the References section itself. This suggests the article may be a stub, under construction, or that any citations in the article body use a different referencing format that wasn't captured in the section extraction.
Asking the assistant to provide the entire contents that is available to them, you'll see that references is not there. While actually viewing the wiki page yourself there are more than 40+ references for this wiki page.
This is a pretty big limitation. I would like to see one of the following to resolve this.
- Have a toggle that allows me to set when I'd like to consume the entirety of the page so that no content is missed for the assistent to process.
- Make the tool call smarter, the prompt (in this case) contains enough information about what the assistant should do, and what information on the page is relevant, so that should not be missed in the tool output. In fact, the only thing that is relevant here are the references, so if the tool call could only pass that to the assistant that would be ideal.
Probably you will want a combination, or an alternative to the above. I do think this is something you should look into more. Though I understand that this might be because of cost-saving measure, with the thinking that most relevant information is at the top of page and to not pollute the context with too much data that will cost more money to process in the end.
