Can we get more transparency around what model Kagi Research uses? This used to be the case but I'm not sure why it is no longer. I trust Kagi to try to use the available models as best as possible to maintain high quality results but I feel that it is important to me to know what model(s) I am talking to as that informs my evaluation of the response. AI is not a magic oracle so we shouldn't treat it as such (i.e. Kagi does not claim that Kagi Research will give you vetted true responses and it is on the user to exercise their judgement when reading the response, and as such the user should have all the tools/transparency needed to use for their judgement).
In the currently existing model text box would be fine
