When you search for a query that has a Snopes.com search result (ex. "was nazi Germany socialist"), the result has a text excerpt that is often the opposite of what the article actually concludes.
In this case, the article is summarized by Kagi search as "The Nazis were left-wing socialists. Yes, the National Socialist Workers Party of Germany, otherwise known as the Nazi Party, was indeed socialist and it had a lot in common with the modern left.", when this is actually a quote from another source in the article that contradicts the final summary in the article.
This is likely due to Kagi taking an excerpt from the first few paragraphs of the article, which are always used on Snopes to restate the claim without assessing accuracy.
I expected that Kagi Search would take an excerpt from the second last or last paragraph in the article, which always provides the most accurate summary in the case of Snopes.com. If Kagi had correctly summarized the article, the excerpt would be:
In lieu of the socialist ideal of an egalitarian, worker-run state, the National Socialists erected a party-run police state whose governing structure was anti-democratic, rigidly hierarchical, and militaristic in nature.
or
Despite co-opting the name, some of the rhetoric, and even some of the precepts of socialism, Hitler and party did so with utter cynicism, and with vastly different goals. The claim that the Nazis actually were leftists or socialists in any generally accepted sense of those terms flies in the face of historical reality.
