The "Quick Peek" section of search results appear to be sourced from Google's "People also ask" section, which often displays misleading, inaccurate, or outdated information.
For example, a search on "AAPL" brings up a result titled "Will Apple stock reach $700 again?" and links to a 10 year old article. The age of the article and failure to split adjust the number makes it impossible for this to be a current search topic.
This sort of inaccurate information is what I hoped to avoid with Kagi.
Kagi should not rely on Google or other advertising based search engines for results or rankings. At the very least, such results should be clearly identified along with an option to suppress them.
