Especially with what we see Elon doing with Grok on X, I think it's an appropriate time to reiterate that the only and most important reason I've opted to Kagi for my family instead of OpenAI or other such subscriptions is because I am not comfortable supporting closed source, politically motivated and International law disregarding practices. It's been one month since I've got the annual group subscription and I must say, I am not at all comfortable or content with the filters my queries get me. Kagi should make it exclusively clear whether its LLM models suffer from the same anti China, anti Palestinian, pro Authoritarian, pro Israeli censorship that other platforms are gearing towards. If my bid for degoogling is supporting yet another platform that is politically motivated to protect Israelofascist interests, I would have not bought this subscription. As an example, anytime I use the LLM to refine the grammar and language on some of my texts, instead of just giving it to me, it takes every opportunity to frame my substance in an anti palestine, pro Israeli fashion, despite my claims explicitly being sourced independently from reputed organisations such as the UN, Amnesty, Haartetz, B'TSelem etc. This serves neither me as a writer looking to leverage LLMs responsibly, nor you as a service provider who seek to offer an alternative to the big tech platforms. This way, people can be aware of what biases their chosen LLM model would tend to and select appropriately. The key here is to be transparent and not engage in covert or overt censorship practices.
As explained above, this is simply a clear and informational disclaimer that reiterates and reinforces the companies policies that allows users like me to make informed decisions on whether our degoogling efforts are best spent into Kagi or not
