I appreciate the sentiment here but if you search this feedback forum you’ll probably find a lot of support for the opposite of this. People are very sensitive about “”””censorship””””, whatever that term means to them. The Kagi team largely express the sentiment of not wanting to put a thumb on the scale with search results or insert bias or censor results intentionally.
Personally, I block bad sources with prejudice and the site mentioned here would absolutely be one of them. Kagi offers a lot of personalization and filtering tools that put the user in control which is really powerful.
Ultimately I guess there’s a whole lot of bad people and bad information out there on the web.
Although I will add that I don’t think a source like that should be in even the top 20 results. Since Kagi is all about search quality, that’s something that should be considered.
