I searched for "signal stickers" to find a sticker pack for the Signal encrypted messaging app, and while scrolling through the results, I saw the following Quick Peek:
"Are Signal stickers safe?"
"No. The app itself is safe (and one of the most secure messenger apps by the way) so installing it from the official store is definitely not going to harm you."
Not only is this Quick Peek answer internally inconsistent (the quoted answer doesn't match the Quick Peek question), Kagi's question isn't even what was originally asked. If you click through to the cited link:
You'll see that the question asked is "Is there danger of [Signal] trying to hack my phone?", which is a question with the exact opposite answer of "Is Signal safe?" and not the same as "Are Signal stickers safe?"
I expected a Quick Peek that found a relevant Reddit post to my Kagi search query and accurately summarized the question in the cited Reddit post, not a Quick Peek that pulled an almost random post and incorrectly summarized the question to make it the opposite of what was actually asked. I expected a higher level of quality from Kagi as a paid search engine.
