I was researching the range of Amazonian manatees.
I found a quick look which interpreted this Wikipedia text: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manatee
The freshwater Amazonian manatee (T. inunguis) inhabits the Central Amazon Basin in Brazil, eastern Perú, southeastern Colombia, but not Ecuador. It is the only exclusively freshwater manatee, and is also the smallest. Since they are unable to reduce peripheral heat loss, it is found primarily in tropical waters.
Into this quick look AI output (says that it is summarizing wikpedia):
The Amazonian manatee (Trichechus inunguis) is a species of manatee that lives in the Amazon Basin in Brazil, Peru, Colombia and Ecuador. It has thin, wrinkled brownish or gray colored skin, with fine hairs scattered over its body and a white chest patch. It is the smallest of the three extant species of manatee.
It's just completely the opposite of correct about the manatee's range in Ecuador. I am so upset that this kind of inaccurate stuff ended up in here. If you can identify the exact part of the Wikipedia text which is about what I'm look for, why are you pushing it through a planet-burning AI process to summarize and rephrase it at all? You could have just shown me the actual excerpt of the wikipedia page and it would be more correct. This is so annyoing. I've turned it off. I'm warning you about this failure because I figure you probably want to be giving people the best service possible - not rephrasing a chunk of text into a different chunk of text which is the same length but now contains lies.
I am now reconsidering my Kagi membership entirely.
I expected to receive correct information from the search engine which I pay for.
