No search results found
Are we sure this is even related to the exact query text and not the result of an unhandled error flow or missing retry somewhere in the fabric?
dcow It is not related to the query text - trying with different casing as people of done just breaks a cache and allows a full retry. The main thing that we have been looking at is GC pauses pushing things over our latency budgets, but we're continuing to buid in more observability tooling to get a deeper understanding.
I searched for "fzf-share"
(exact string match) and got back no results. After I realised I had safe search on, I disabled it and got the expected results.
I would expect to get back the results even while safe search is enabled, since they were SFW webpages: GitHub, the NixOS wiki, SFW sub-Reddits, and a couple of personal blogs.
What's maybe also interesting is that DuckDuckGo does not return results either (both in safe and unsafe mode), whereas Google gives back the expected answers by default.
- Edited
I have safe search enabled and that request works fine on my side.
sometime some browser plugins extensions/add-ons (sorry ) can break websites behaviour.
The following search indicates that there are a number of image results available.
Clicking the link to view these images produces the following page.
The images that appeared on in the regular search results should have been available.
I get the same if searching for « journée du steamé » - tried a few times on different days and devices.
Searching for Musketeer pack
returns no results.
https://kagi.com/search?q=Musketeer+pack
Connected to: AUSTRA-SOUTHEAST1
Searched for musketeer pack
, that works. Searched for Musketeer pack
again, still no results.
I am facing the same issue for the search term "check if any ufw rule is enabled" (without quotes):
I also encountered this where query: apple HomePod vs Sudio Display sound quality -mini
did not resurn results.
Where query: apple HomePod vs Sudio Display sound quality -mini ?
did yield results.
And after a while the OG query did provide similar (if not the same) as the quick answer one.
Just ran into this too, going back a few minutes later it got the results that I expected just fine.
I've also seen this for a few times recently, e.g.