Steps to reproduce:
- Go to the Summarizer
- Input the following link: https://www.neatorama.com/2011/10/18/the-pathology-of-classical-sculpture/
- Once summarized, select Discuss further
- Input the following: "is there any book,article or paper referenced in this page?"
- the type of answer is as follow: "No, there are no books, articles or papers referenced in the provided web page. The entire content appears to be written by the author to describe their personal observations and experiments conducted while visiting sculptures in the Vatican. There are no citations or links to any external sources included."
Expected behavior:
This should correctly point out the Nature paper found in this extract present on the page:
"
Editor’s Note
Readers may wish to supplement the observations and analysis in the article with the mostly (but not entirely) related data and commentary gathered and performed three decades earlier by another doctor from the United Kingdom, who also conducted independent research in Italy. See Chris McManus’s “Scrotal Asymmetry in Man and in Ancient Sculpture,” Nature, vol. 259, February 5, 1976, p. 426.
A snippet of McManus’s study “Scrotal Asymmetry in Man and Ancient Sculpture.”
"
I suspect the word scrotum is sanitized by whatever LLM used, but it's a shame.
As it happens, I was demo-ing the Summarizer with this exact query, and the other person was not impressed.
Debug info:
Firefox Android / EUROPE-WEST2
Extra suggestion: add a summarize tag on.this forum for users submitting reports like mine. Not sure "Search quality" is the correct tag. 🙂
