Summarizer of search results similar to Brave search

bls0n

I'd be interested in seeing a results summarizer similar to Brave Search.

I'm coming from Brave search and have gotten used to their AI Summarizer feature. When using Kagi search I get the links to websites that are relevant, but miss seeing an interpretation of the content of these websites. For me at least the Quick Answer feature in Kagi usually doesn't give a response unless a specific question is posed. I included an example below.

Search term: canadian syncope score

Brave AI results:
The Canadian Syncope Risk Score (CSRS) is a clinical decision tool used to predict serious clinical outcomes after complete emergency department evaluation for syncope.02 It includes nine clinical, electrocardiographic, and lab components, including patient history, electrocardiogram findings, clinical impression, and troponin testing. The CSRS was externally validated in a prospective cohort of 3,819 adults at nine Canadian emergency departments from 2014 to 2018. The probability of a serious outcome was estimated at less than 1% in the low-risk and very low-risk groups and more than 12% in the high-risk and very high-risk groups. The prevalence of serious outcomes within 30 days was 3.6%, and only 0.2% of patients at very low risk and 0.7% of patients at low risk had a serious outcome, compared with 51% of patients at very high risk.1 The CSRS is one of several clinical decision tools used in the emergency department following a syncopal episode.

Kagi Quick Answer results:
Sorry, I couldn't find the answer in the results.

Vlad

bls0n Restoring this as it seems relevant. I guess we can try to summarize as well (without any references) and not just answer questions.

Puglife

This was one feature I really liked about Neeva. It summarized most queries not just questions. So if you looked up Apple for example it would summarize information about Apple. Using same search as above this is what Neeva produced. I think having the sources cited within the summary was a great detail to make it more reliable and easy to find where information was pulled from.

“The Canadian Syncope Risk Score is a calculator that predicts 30-day serious adverse events in patients presenting with syncope. It is externally validated and is applicable to patients 16 years old presenting 24 hours of syncope. The risk score will estimate the probability of serious adverse event including arrhythmia and death within the next 30-days. The score can be used to identify the medium and high-risk patients and for quick disposition of low-risk patients. A prospective cohort validation study found that 3 (0.3%) out of 1631 patients at very low risk experienced serious 30-day outcomes, while approximately 20% and 50% of high risk and very-high risk patients experienced serious 30-day outcomes. The authors suggest that the CSRS should be used in conjunction with other risk stratification tools to help identify patients with serious underlying conditions and to advocate its superior use over some of the other risk stratification tools.
Sources
mdcalc.com
qxmd.com
reference.medscape.com
rebelem.com”

Vlad

Sure, I think we can expand this to be a more general summary and work with queries like 'canadian syncope score'

ruihildt

In the specific coding domain, I found phind.com to work pretty well with that same model.

z64

We have made overall improvements to our pipeline here. Please give it another try and let us know what you think! @ruihildt @bls0n

bls0n

z64

Looks great! The summary is very helpful and exactly what I was hoping for. Thanks so much for implementing it!

ruihildt

Looks good!

I'm not sure about the end message:

Hope this helps! Let me know if you have any other questions.

I'm personally not a fan of the personnification of what is essentially an algorithm.
I find it misleading and nof adding any value to my search experience.

Moreover the call to action "let me know if you have questions" is unclear.
Shall I send "you" an email?
Do I have to click somewhere to talk to "you"?

If it is expected of me to refine my search, tell me so somehow. Or invite me to explore the search results, depending on what you believe is the best way to serve the user.