Tomsguide and BGR sites incorrectly marked as AI slop

kslays

I found these three pages incorrectly marked as AI slop:
https://www.tomsguide.com/phones/android-phones/android-17-changes-worth-paying-attention-to

https://www.bgr.com/2201110/android-17-problems-need-to-be-fixed/

https://www.tomsguide.com/phones/android-phones/ive-been-using-android-16-for-two-weeks-heres-why-im-so-underwhelmed

This Yahoo page also, although it appears to actually be Android Central copy (or syndication):
https://tech.yahoo.com/articles/android-17-fixing-two-things-170000369.html

The pages should not be marked as AI slop.

Pleonasm

I am curious to know the process by which Kagi tagged these webpages as AI slop? What is happening behind-the-scenes to produce these classifications?

P.S.: I am not trying to be critical of Kagi - but, am simply trying to understand more about how the company decides whether a website is AI slop or not. A blog by Kagi that transparently documents the process may be of interest to customers.