You judge if you would find this useful:
Add an optional "details" field to the slop report function in Kagi search. I could imagine it makes it easier to be pointed to the slop indicators when reviewing.
One of my slop reports is 'under review' since February so I'm assuming it's not working super flawlessly right now.
(Would also be happy to review some slop reports myself. Of course not my own.)
When reporting slop, a user can optionally tell you what they saw that makes them think it is slop. Eg page where one author publishes 10 articles a day, for days on end; weird menu choices that you don't see immediately, images not matching the article, ...
Both users and reviewer can choose to ignore the field.
