It seems to me that there is an ongoing series of factual errors produced by Kagi Search that are reported in this forum (and, who knows how many more that remain unreported). I do appreciate the fact that the Kagi team generally fixes the defects promptly.
However, as a consequence, I personally do not trust (and do not use) Kagi for some of the most basic web queries, because I cannot have faith in the veracity of the output.
For a paid subscription that advertises itself as a "premium" service, this is disappointing. I hope that Kagi devotes more resources and attention to the Search product to remediate this situation, and thereby elevate the quality of the product to ensure a high level of consistent correctness.
